Monday, November 29, 2004

Not So Kosher

Almost anything anyone buys at stores carries one of the above symbols or a variation, yet very few consumers know what the symbols mean. According to the largest kosher company in the United States, the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations, “over $150 billion of kosher certified products are consumed annually, and spending continues to rise dramatically” (Getting par. 1).
Why would companies go through the process of becoming Kosher? Here’s what the company thinks:
There is clear evidence that a kosher symbol boosts market share, that a kosher product can win more favorable shelf space, and that positioned next to a competing non-kosher brand, a kosher product will do better by 20%. This data has remained constant even in the smaller cities, far from heavier concentrations of kosher Jews. (Source: Integrated Marketing Communications.) …Most importantly, be sure that all your certified products, whether retail or industrial, feature the logo prominently on the label or packaging, as well as in your advertising. This will not only help your sales, but will also make your products easily identifiable as kosher by food industry personnel, kosher inspectors, and consumers throughout the world (Getting par. 3-5).
This may be true among Jews, but it seemed to both frighten and infuriate those who had never known about kosher symbols.
It is this knowledge that has and continues to fan the flame of conspiracy ideas. The Anti-Defamation League, a group that works to defend Israel and Jews, has a section on their website solely to what they call the “kosher tax myth.” They cite a 1975 study by New York Times that says that consumers pay less than 1% more money on kosher products than non-kosher products (ADL par. 6). The A.D.L. says that “the profit from these products goes, of course, to the companies that manufacture them and the stores that sell them, not to ‘the Jews’” (ADL par. 7). They then dedicate the majority of the page to saying that all information about a kosher tax scam is from Anti-Semites and therefore should be discarded.
When I googled “kosher tax,” I arrived at a website by a group called Aztlan that did seem to be Anti-Semitic. The author of the article described what seemed to be a common response to finding the symbols on everything:
On arriving at my residence, I immediately went to the pantry to verify that what I had just learned was actually true. Sure enough, most of the packaged and canned foods from major companies, like Proctor & Gamble and others, did have the (U), the (K) or other similar markings. The Arrowhead water bottle, the instant Folgers Coffee, the Kelloggs box, the Jiff Peanut Butter, the Pepper container, the Trader Joe's tea box and even the Glads plastic sandwich bags carton had the (U) or (K) mark on them (Cienfuegos par. 2).
Aztlan describes the “kosher tax scam” in detail:
I learned that major food companies throughout America actually pay a Jewish Tax amounting to hundreds of million of dollars per year in order to receive protection. This hidden tax gets passed, of course, to all non-Jewish consumers of the products. The scam is to coerce the companies to pay up or suffer the consequences of a Jewish boycott. … The amount of money that the non-Jewish consumer has paid the food companies to make up for the hidden Jewish Tax is unknown, but it is estimated to be in the billions since the scam first started. The Orthodox Jewish Councils as well as the food companies keep the amount of the fees very secret. The Jewish owned Wall Street Journal wrote about the problem many years ago, but they have stopped writing about it now (Cienfuegos pars. 4, 9).

8 Comments:

Blogger cueto said...

It did take me 30 seconds, they hide it well from us average consumers :0).

November 30, 2004 at 4:59 PM  
Blogger cueto said...

If I was Jewish I'd be thrilled at the kosher symbol, but I'm not so why should my money go to these companies?

November 30, 2004 at 5:37 PM  
Blogger Not Scott said...

The thinly disguised anti-Semitism is old hat and pretty much dismissed by all reputable sources. Your post doesn't indicate your particular stance on them (although your comments indicate you disapprove of kosher lables), but taking such a stand based on web-sites produced by fringe elements consigns your argument to the fringe. You will not--and never be--taken seriously. You will be ignored or ridiculed. There are real problems in the world. The Jewish conspiracy is not one of them.

November 30, 2004 at 5:57 PM  
Blogger cueto said...

"Thinly disguised anti-semitism" sounds like a tract from the ADL. Any statements against Israel's policy against the Palestinians have been described as "thinly disguised anti-semtisim."

I took both extremes, one by a latino extremist group and one by a Jewish extremist group. The issue IS hotly contested still, although there are plenty of other problems in the world like hunger and the plague, just because you don't think it's an important issue does not mean it's not an important issue. Many people thought that gay marriage in the last election wasn't an important issue only to find out that it was to the majority of voters.

And like many liberals you didn't give any reasons why it is "thinly disguised anti-semitism" you just threw out a slur without any backing. In my world of logic, the person making an accusation must be the person defending the accusation. You will not silence my voice.

November 30, 2004 at 6:11 PM  
Blogger Not Scott said...

Oh, ok. I'll show you were you are being anti-Semitic, although you know perfectly well what you are doing. This being a course about the use of language, I'll argue with you.

Specific places:
"This may be true among Jews, but it seemed to both frighten and infuriate those who had never known about kosher symbols."
--implies that there is something sinister and...what, unethical or evil? about the kosher symbol.

"described what seemed to be a common response "
--suggests that all normal people "react" to learning that their peanut butter is kosher. Positions the reader in an "us versus them" dichotomy.

And the comments by the Aztlan site, that admittedly you call extremist, are left without critical attention in this post. Such absence implies that their extremism is closer to the truth than the quotes from the ADL which you do comment on as being alarming.

On a more general level, the post's logic requires that the reader admit an adversarial relationship between "the Jews" and the rest of society: that the Jewish people are scamming all the rest of us. You are deliberately (or perhaps unwittingly) tapping into centuries of anti-Semitic rhetoric when you use such terms as conspiracy and raise the spectre of a kosher tax. It's like a poet writing that her "lips were blood red" and feigning shock that anyone would see overtones of violence in the words.

I'm not trying to silence your voice. It may indeed be a serious argument in some portions of society. These portions are rejected by the mainstream. I'm telling you that this type of argument will eventually marginalize you. You may as well claim that the Jewish people are responsible for the myth of evolution, they created the notion of a round earth, and the sun revolves around the earth. At its least offensive, yours is a kooky argument. You can make a kooky argument. You'll be considered a kook.

November 30, 2004 at 6:41 PM  
Blogger cueto said...

To add on to my earlier comment. The teacher wanted us to bring a new argument forward that isn't dull like abortion or legalizing marijuana. Believe it or not most people haven't heard about this idea, it isn't "old hat."

What I like to do is to get both extremes, for and against, and try to find a happy medium--which I did in my paper. Although I'm against the deceptive kosher symbols I respect the right for companies to have them.

This is no conspiracy either, the symbols are really on products http://www.aztlan.net/koshersymbols.gif these kosher companies have websites like www.ok.org or www.ou.org and the money they get is real as referred to by the San Francisco Chronicle http://www.detnews.com/2001/food/0104/09/c09-208222.htm

November 30, 2004 at 6:42 PM  
Blogger cueto said...

In response to your arguments I'll say that most people do not know about these symbols. That is my only argument really, the symbols are deceptive. In the kosher companie's website it states that Jews look for these symbols and openly endorse only these symbols as seen by a 20% profit gain from kosher companies as opposoed to non-kosher companies.

I never once said "the Jews" that phrase comes from the mouth of the extremist ADL, not me. I never once said that the Jews were responsible, I just blamed the companies. Just like you would never blame the people going to Mcdonalds for environmental problems stemming from that company, but you would blame the company. So once again it's not "tapping" into anti-semitism.

I didn't criticize the Aztlan quotes because I didn't have space, I already exceeded the 500 words by posting both sides of the story. But if you want I cna post the rest of the paper, but I plan on bringing it to you tomorrow since I'm done.

I could have attacked the ADL for them using data from 1975 or for saying that the kosher companies don't make money off the kosher labels, but I didn't.

November 30, 2004 at 6:49 PM  
Blogger cueto said...

Oh yeah I forgot to respond to the comment that people react with frustration at finding out the kosher symbols. That's because the symbols are deceptive, I was shocked when I found out, so were a lot of my friends. If they didn't want people to get so hyped up on conspiracy theories then maybe they should have been a little less deceptive. I e-mailed a kosher company asking them why not put "approved by Jews" or "Jewish approved" under the kosher symbol. I haven't received a response yet.

November 30, 2004 at 6:51 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home